Truth is not determined by majority vote.

The statement rejects the idea that truth is established by consensus or popularity. It draws a sharp line between what most people believe (or what a community votes to affirm) and what is actually the case. In ethical, religious, or political settings, it functions as a warning against conformism: majorities can be mistaken, self-interested, or swept along by fashion, propaganda, or fear. The quote also implies a more demanding standard for judgment—truth must be sought through evidence, reason, or fidelity to principle rather than social approval. As a rhetorical maxim, it is often used to defend dissent, minority viewpoints, and conscience against the pressure of collective opinion.