Every spiritual tradition has this idea of death and resurrection. It’s not unique to Christianity.

Chopra is framing “death and resurrection” less as a single historical claim and more as a recurring spiritual motif: the cycle of ending and renewal found across religions and mythic systems. Read this way, “death” can signify the dissolution of an old identity, ego, or worldview, while “resurrection” names transformation—rebirth into a new mode of being. The point is comparative and universalizing: Christianity’s resurrection narrative is presented as one expression of a broader human pattern of meaning-making around mortality, suffering, and hope. The remark also reflects Chopra’s perennialist tendency to emphasize shared symbols across traditions rather than doctrinal uniqueness.