[I] asked people to quantify themselves on a scale of one to 100 percent gay, and I watched so many existential crises unfold in front of me. People didn't know what to do, because they had never been presented with the option before.

Wright’s remark highlights how identity categories can function less as descriptions of lived experience than as social scripts people feel compelled to follow. By asking for a percentage, Wright replaces a binary with a spectrum, and the “existential crises” suggest that many people’s self-understanding depends on the availability of culturally sanctioned boxes. The quote implies that sexuality is often more fluid, contextual, or ambiguous than public language allows, and that expanding the available options can be both liberating and destabilizing. It also points to the power of a well-designed question: a small shift in framing can expose the limits of conventional thinking and invite more honest self-assessment.