Creative minds have always been known to survive any kind of bad training.

The remark suggests a resilient view of creativity: genuine imaginative capacity can persist even when education or upbringing is rigid, discouraging, or poorly suited to a child’s needs. Implicitly, it critiques “training” that prioritizes conformity over exploration, while also offering reassurance that creativity is not easily extinguished by external pressures. Read in a psychoanalytic key, it aligns with the idea that inner drives and capacities can outlast adverse environments, though not without cost. The quote is often used in educational contexts to argue for nurturing, flexible pedagogy—and to caution that bad instruction may hinder expression, but may not fully eradicate creative potential.