I’m not for gratuitous nudity, but if there’s humor, I don’t have a problem.

Romijn draws a boundary between nudity used as mere titillation (“gratuitous”) and nudity that serves a narrative or comedic purpose. The remark suggests a pragmatic, performance-oriented ethic: content that advances tone, character, or humor can be artistically justified, while nudity included without clear motivation is suspect. Coming from an actor frequently discussed in relation to screen image and sexuality, the quote also reads as a bid for agency—framing on-screen exposure as a creative choice governed by intent and context rather than by shock value or exploitation. It implicitly defends comedy’s capacity to disarm taboo through laughter.