A rich person should leave his kids enough to do something, but not enough to do nothing.

Warren Buffett has repeatedly discussed inheritance and family wealth in interviews and shareholder communications, arguing that large fortunes can sap initiative if passed on without limits. The remark is typically invoked in the context of his broader philosophy of “enough” inheritance—providing children with opportunity and security while still requiring them to build purposeful lives of their own. Buffett has also contrasted this approach with dynastic wealth, emphasizing personal responsibility and the idea that parents should support education and a good start rather than guarantee lifelong leisure. The line is often quoted in discussions of estate planning and philanthropy, alongside Buffett’s public commitment to give most of his wealth away rather than leave it to heirs.

The quote frames inheritance as a tool for empowerment rather than insulation. “Enough to do something” suggests providing resources that expand choices—education, seed capital, a safety net—so children can pursue meaningful work and take constructive risks. “Not enough to do nothing” warns that excessive unearned wealth can erode motivation, distort values, and reduce the sense of purpose that comes from striving. Buffett’s formulation also implies a moral stance: wealth carries obligations, and the richest families should avoid creating permanent leisure classes within their own households. It is a concise argument for balancing generosity with the cultivation of character and agency.

1) “Leave your children enough so they can do anything, but not enough so they can do nothing.”
2) “Give your kids enough to do something, but not enough to do nothing.”
3) “Parents should leave their children enough money so they can do anything, but not so much that they can do nothing.”