Integrity has no need of rules.

Taken at face value, the line suggests that genuine integrity is an internal compass rather than a compliance with external codes. Rules are necessary where motives are mixed, incentives distort behavior, or trust is absent; a person of integrity, by contrast, does the right thing without needing surveillance, threats, or detailed prescriptions. Read in a Camusian key, it also hints at an ethics grounded in lucid personal responsibility rather than in abstract systems: moral worth is proven in concrete choices, not in allegiance to a rulebook. The aphorism therefore contrasts principled character with mere rule-following, implying that legality and morality can diverge.